Legal and General PPI Claim
Legal and General
PPI Claim Form
Have you ever had PPI with Legal and General?
If you answer "No" to any of the below questions, there's a very good chance Legal and General mis-sold you PPI:
Legal and General should not have added PPI to your agreement without your permission.
Legal and General should have given you the unpressurised option of having PPI.
PPI would not have been needed from Legal and General if you had pre-existing PPI cover elsewhere.
Legal and General should have explained the cost of PPI to you at the point of sale.
If over 50% of your PPI premiums were paid in commission to Legal and General and this was not explained to you, the "Plevin" ruling means you were mis-sold.
Again, Legal and General should have given you the option of having PPI or not.
Your right to cancel PPI within the cooling off period should have been explained to you by Legal and General.
To start your Legal and General PPI claim, follow our simple 4 step guide above.
My Claim Solved have had great success in reclaiming PPI for customers against Legal and General and so far we have reclaimed over £42m* for our clients in PPI mis-selling.
If you were mis-sold PPI by Legal and General, and the claim is successful, you would be entitled to a full refund of PPI premiums you paid to Legal and General, a full refund of interest charged and compensation interest at 8% per annum on the above sums.
Don't Delay! If you would like to start your PPI Claim against Legal and General, complete the form at the top of this page.
* PPI refunds obtained through our claims service, amount is prior to our fees plus VAT and any income tax.
Many consumers may have been mis-sold PPI (Payment Protection Insurance) by Legal and General, PPI may have been added to a customer's policy by Legal and General, in some cases without their knowledge. Legal and General may have rejected a credit application if PPI was refused by the customer.
Legal and General PPI wasn't all bad, it was intended to protect borrowers' from being unable to make repayments if they were unable to work due to illness or injury. The problem was how PPI was mis-sold by Legal and General.
There are many examples of Legal and General mis-selling PPI, some customers were not even made aware by Legal and General that PPI was added to their policy, and if the customer was made aware that PPI had been attached, they were not informed by Legal and General that it was optional.
A new PPI mis-selling factor called "Plevin", which means if over 50% of the PPI premiums you paid were set out as commission to Legal and General, and this was not clarified to you at the point of sale, then you would be due compensation from Legal and General.