Swift Advances PPI Claim
PPI Claim Form
Have you ever had PPI with Swift Advances?
If you answer "No" to any of the below questions, there's a very good chance Swift Advances mis-sold you PPI:
Swift Advances should not have added PPI to your agreement without your permission.
Swift Advances should have given you the unpressurised option of having PPI.
PPI would not have been needed from Swift Advances if you had pre-existing PPI cover elsewhere.
Swift Advances should have explained the cost of PPI to you at the point of sale.
If over 50% of your PPI premiums were paid in commission to Swift Advances and this was not explained to you, the "Plevin" ruling means you were mis-sold.
Again, Swift Advances should have given you the option of having PPI or not.
Your right to cancel PPI within the cooling off period should have been explained to you by Swift Advances.
To start your Swift Advances PPI claim, follow our simple 4 step guide above.
My Claim Solved have had great success in reclaiming PPI for customers against Swift Advances and so far we have reclaimed over £42m* for our clients in PPI mis-selling.
If you were mis-sold PPI by Swift Advances, and the claim is successful, you would be entitled to a full refund of PPI premiums you paid to Swift Advances, a full refund of interest charged and compensation interest at 8% per annum on the above sums.
Don't Delay! If you would like to start your PPI Claim against Swift Advances, complete the form at the top of this page.
* PPI refunds obtained through our claims service, amount is prior to our fees plus VAT and any income tax.
Many customers may have been mis-sold PPI (Payment Protection Insurance) by Swift Advances, PPI may have been attached to a customer's policy by Swift Advances, in some cases without their knowledge. Swift Advances may have declined a credit application if PPI was refused by the customer.
Swift Advances PPI wasn't all bad, it was intended to protect borrowers' from being unable to make repayments if they were unable to work due to illness or injury. The problem was how PPI was mis-sold by Swift Advances.
There are many examples of Swift Advances mis-selling PPI, some customers were not even made aware by Swift Advances that PPI was attached to their policy, and if the customer was made aware that PPI had been attached, they were not told by Swift Advances that it was optional.
A new PPI mis-selling factor called "Plevin", which means if over 50% of the PPI premiums you paid were set out as commission to Swift Advances, and this was not demonstrated to you at the point of sale, then you would be due compensation from Swift Advances.